home | register | login
Posted: April 8, 2008 12:20:00 am
Only a few hours til you can vote on the smoking ban in Kansas City.

Here's what happens if the ban passes: It takes effect in 60 days. Smoking would be banned at all times in Kansas City bars and restaurants, but would still be allowed on casino gambling floors, but only until a ban is adopted in casinos in neighboring cities.

Gotta love the red tape.

On Monday, pro-ban people held signs at the Plaza, reminding people to vote Tuesday. Some bars around town have signs asking people to vote against the ban.

Polls are open from 6 a.m. to 7 p.m.

If you forget where your polling place is, go here.

But first, tell us how you're going to vote.

Last edited April 8, 2008 12:20:34 am
Posted: April 8, 2008 10:10:08 am
nay... why? principal. what's good for one is good for all. don't bring me half-assed legislation, that the masses may vote for... bring me something that makes sense. unfortunately, i see this as an ordinance that just may pass because people are tired of smokey bars. i say vote with your dollar and go where smoke free bars are - they're springing up all over the kansas city metropolitan area. i don't like smoke as much as the next person, but i dislike impractical ordinances even more. when voting listen to your heart and not necessarily your lungs today. ;)

Last edited April 8, 2008 10:12:08 am
Keepin' It Real!

The Bruceā„¢

Maude Lebowski: "What do you do for recreation?"
The Dude: "Oh, the usual. I bowl. Drive around. The occasional acid flashback."
Posted: April 8, 2008 12:40:44 pm
I nay. I dont smoke but I appreciate my second hand every once in a while. Have to have it at a rock and roll show or takes the myth away of the rockers.
"He's no good to me dead."
Posted: April 8, 2008 1:51:01 pm
yea.

sorry. so many of my friends are smokers. And I respect their right to smoke. Hell, I'll occasionally take a drag myself. But I don't want to come home smelling like an ash tray every time I go see some live music.

Is it dumb and unfair that casinos get a pass? Yes it is. Does it reflect poorly on our Democracy that they have lobbyists that can buy them immunity to legislation? You betcha. But taking a half step in the right direction is better than no step at all. Pass the ban and then let's work to make it apply to the casinos as well.

And to the bar owners who fear that they'll lose customers who smoke: rest easy. I vouch that if this ban passes, I'll drink twice as much in 2008 to help offset your losses. I know many nonsmokers will do the same, as we'll finally be able to enjoy ourselves at your establishments w/o being chased out by the stink.


Last edited April 8, 2008 1:51:33 pm
Posted: April 8, 2008 2:15:18 pm
If you are going to ban smoking then lets ban drinking, or cooking in restaurants. Sometimes when I go home from a bar I smell like beer, and shitty food. That's why you go. If you don't want to smell like these things then stay inside. Also, lets make every smoker stand right outside the door so the non-smokers have to still walk through a giant tar cloud. Fact is obesity, cell-phoes, even working out too much will kill you these days so what does it reall matter. The same person who doesn't want any second hand smoke on them will go out and eat 45 cheese burgers from wendys as if that is any better...

I should point out that I am a non-smoker who used to smoke but I still feel like banning it is a witch hunt and no matter what you do you will never get away from it
That's a ran-a-can baby!
Posted: April 8, 2008 2:38:05 pm
i think the owners should have the right to choose what their establishment's experience is all about. the atmosphere is just as important as the menu or the service...
COLE ME ON THE PANNY STY
Posted: April 8, 2008 3:03:25 pm
I am suspicious of all kinds of bans...
Posted: April 8, 2008 4:52:54 pm
bobby_topaz said:
If you are going to ban smoking then lets ban drinking, or cooking in restaurants. Sometimes when I go home from a bar I smell like beer, and shitty food. That's why you go....


I should clarify, lest anyone think I support the kind of reasoning that would lead to "banning cooking".

I think any adult should be allowed to do whatever s/he please to his/her body (and to each other, if it is consensual), in their own homes, or in public spaces specifically designated for the exercise of that activity. It should not be the government's roll to protect you from yourself or tell you what you can do, so long as it involves consensual adults. Your lifestyle is your choice.

Where regulations become necessary is when the exercise of your personal rights and liberties impinge on somebody else's. You should have the right to smoke whatever you want so long as it doesn't impinge on other people's right to breathe clean air at a bar or music venue. We should instead follow the more enlightened Dutch example, and make establishments (smoke shops) where you go specifically to smoke, and can smoke whatever you please. Hell, you can smoke paint chips for all I care, just don't make me breathe it. Smoking should be limited to your own house/car and smoke shops. Everyone should have the means to exercise their rights and liberties w/o imposing on another. I want to be able to go to a music concert w/o second hand smoke. But I will defend to the death your right to smoke in your own home or in a smoke shop.

Last edited April 8, 2008 5:38:56 pm
Posted: April 8, 2008 6:34:41 pm
Again I agree...no one should tell you what to do or infringe on your civil liberties. However, don't you think that telling a business owner what they can and cannot do is and infringement as well? The government should stay out of that too babies...it's just not right I tell ya. Again, even if they take smoke out of these places there is a tremendous chance especially during the winter months when the huddle masses stand under covered doorways of bars that you are still going to inhale smoke no matter what. Also, who is to say that the air you are breathing in any bar is clean without smoke?

Going to a bar and not coming home smelling like smoke is like coming home from a strip club and not having any glitter on you. Or saying..."man I really want to go to that strip club and hang but I am sooo tired of seeing boobies." It's just part of the bag.

Again, no ill will or venom at you Hector or anyone for that matter who dis agrees...just playing the devil here I suppose. I just feel like if you don't like the place then perhaps visit another. Or only see bands in clubs that don't allow smoking. The owners should not have to pay the price. Not to mention it directly helps out casinos..which is another can all together
That's a ran-a-can baby!
Posted: April 8, 2008 7:23:11 pm
You know what I can get behind? The establishment and legalization of smoke shops, Amsterdam style. So people who wanna smoke (anything they please too, but that is another thread) got a place to go. The govt already tells business what they can do if these businesses are public places (hence alcohol licenses, bans against public displays of "adult" materials, etc.) And if a bar wants to allow smoking, just change its classification to bar AND smoke shop, and everyone is happy. And if bands wanted to play there, then I'd just have to bite it and go see them there and smell like an ash tray when I come home.

Basically, vice is a matter of personal choice and responsibility. It should be legal, but in designated context so it does not infringe on someone else's rights. I respect you right to get drunk, get high, trash your liver, gamble your life's savings away, and put crap in lungs. Just do it in your own home or in designated places where I won't have to suffer the consequences of your actions.



Last edited April 8, 2008 7:44:54 pm
Great deals from Ink Advertisers
Visit ads.inkkc.com